home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 94 19:36:23 PST
- From: Info-Hams Mailing List and Newsgroup <info-hams@ucsd.edu>
- Errors-To: Info-Hams-Errors@UCSD.Edu
- Reply-To: Info-Hams@UCSD.Edu
- Precedence: Bulk
- Subject: Info-Hams Digest V94 #297
- To: Info-Hams
-
-
- Info-Hams Digest Wed, 16 Mar 94 Volume 94 : Issue 297
-
- Today's Topics:
- 2 meter use in London, England? (2 msgs)
- Chest Harness
- Daily Summary of Solar Geophysical Activity for 15 March
- Diesel or Taurus fr HF/VHF mobile??
- Info Req. Vintage Gear
- WARNING: Potential Satellite Anomaly Warning Update - 16 March
-
- Send Replies or notes for publication to: <Info-Hams@UCSD.Edu>
- Send subscription requests to: <Info-Hams-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>
- Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
-
- Archives of past issues of the Info-Hams Digest are available
- (by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/info-hams".
-
- We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
- herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
- policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: 16 Mar 1994 16:55:46 GMT
- From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!cleveland.Freenet.Edu!cw400@network.ucsd.edu
- Subject: 2 meter use in London, England?
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- Most repeaters in Europe, including the UK, require a 1750 Hz
- tone burst at the beginning of your transmission to access the
- repeater. European ham gear usually include the tone burst as
- a standard feature, but your american gear will not have this
- feature.
-
- Prehaps you could install the burst encoder in a speaker/mic,
- eliminating the need to perform surgery on your HT. Communication
- Specialists of California sells a sutiable tone burst board,
- you can get their 800 number out of any of the ham mags.
-
- Another method is to access the repeater during the hang time,
- after someone else has transmitted. Of course this requires
- that the repeater is in use, not very useful if a repeater
- is used little or has a very short hang time.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 1994 17:43:19 +0000
- From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk!pavo.csi.cam.ac.uk!pipex!demon!g8sjp.demon.co.uk!ip@network.ucsd.edu
- Subject: 2 meter use in London, England?
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- In article <CMrFLs.G8u@oasis.icl.co.uk>
- prs@oasis.icl.co.uk "Peter Swynford" writes:
-
- > well if you guys stopped funding the IRA, the airport would be a bit
- > safer....
- >
-
- [assorted drivel deleted]
-
- > 73 G0PUB
- > Peter.
-
- I tried *very* hard to find a 'smiley' in this message. In my opinion, I'm
- ashamed for British radio amateurs that such a person should appear to be
- representative of the breed. Makes my flesh crawl, just thinking about it.
-
- --
- Iain Philipps
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 1994 16:38:07 GMT
- From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!sdd.hp.com!hp-cv!hp-pcd!hpcvsnz!mcross@network.ucsd.edu
- Subject: Chest Harness
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- I bought a chest harness from:
- ----------------------------------
- GREEN WOODS
- 960 Sunmist Ct SE
- Salem, OR 97306 (503)378-0148
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL9.4]
-
- Prices as of a couple of years ago were:
- Std model with Cordura backing $19.
- * Std model with Mesh backing $20.
- Two radio model with Cordura backing $25.
- Two radio model with Mesh backing $26.
- -OPTIONS------
- * Spare battery holder $ 1.
- * Penlight holder (for mini mag lite, AA batt) $ 1.
- * Bunting neck protector $ .50
- customer supplied emblems N/C
- other custom work CALL
-
- PLEASE CALL HER to confirm latest prices and options.
- ----------------------------------
-
- I marked the price list with an * for what I have. The mesh allows the air
- to circulate so you don't get to warm wearing the harness. The front is
- a piece of mesh folded in half forming a large pouch which is good for
- a map. Anne also added an additional pocket inside for my compass. The
- radio/battery/penlite pockets are sewn on the front. Very handy system.
-
- I choose black mesh and bright orange for pocket for radio and penlite.
- Velcro straps hold radio into the pocket and also the spare battery. You must
- tell her what radio you want the pocket for(and also battery) so she can
- cut the material to the correct size.
-
- The harness looks like this:
- ____________
- /___________ \
- // \\
- Loops around // \\
- Neck/(bunting)-> || ||
- _||_______________||_
- : : Compass pocket |: : |
- :.: inside pouch --->|: ||: |
- |: ||: / o |
- || is penlite----->|:.||. / i / |
- pocket | || / d / b |
- \\ | / a / |a | | //
- Loops around-> \\ | / r / |t | | //
- waist \\ | / |t | | //
- \\| |__| |//
- Clips to front-> \|______________________|/
-
- 73
- Minor
- --
- Insert Standard Disclaimer notice here:
- NO connection to compnay other than a very satisfied customer.
- ___
- / / Minor Cross KD7YJ
- / / Hewlett-Packard Integrated Circuits Business Div. - Corvallis
- / /_____ _________ 1050 NE Circle Blvd.
- / ___ / ____ / ___ / Corvallis, OR 97330-4299
- / / / / /___/ / /__/ / --------------------------------
- /__/ /__/ / ______/ AT&T: (503) 750-2044
- / / HP telnet 750-2044 FAX (503) 750-3221
- /__/ }!hplabs!cv.hp.com!mcross
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 15 Mar 1994 22:22:23 MST
- From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!dog.ee.lbl.gov!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news.intercon.com!panix!zip.eecs.umich.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!alberta!ve6mgs!usenet@network.ucsd.edu
- Subject: Daily Summary of Solar Geophysical Activity for 15 March
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
-
- DAILY SUMMARY OF SOLAR GEOPHYSICAL ACTIVITY
-
- 15 MARCH, 1994
-
- /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
-
- (Based In-Part On SESC Observational Data)
-
-
- SOLAR AND GEOPHYSICAL ACTIVITY INDICES FOR 15 MARCH, 1994
- ---------------------------------------------------------
-
- SESC NOTICE: Planning for future solar optical and solar radio
- observations is in progress. Consideration is being given to
- having no regular solar activity patrol in the optical and radio
- wavelengths. There is also a possibility of no daily synoptic
- images. Can you describe to us any critical impacts such actions
- would have on your operations or research? Please reply to SESC
- no later than 23 March 1994. Contact by phone or FAX:
- Phone: (303) 497-5127 or FAX: (303) 497-7392
-
- NOTE: Minor stratospheric warming over eastern Siberia, Alaska, and the
- Canadian Arctic continues. Temperature gradient remains reversed
- between 60N and the pole at 10 HPA and above.
-
- !!BEGIN!! (1.0) S.T.D. Solar Geophysical Data Broadcast for DAY 074, 03/15/94
- 10.7 FLUX=087.4 90-AVG=106 SSN=041 BKI=5554 4543 BAI=036
- BGND-XRAY=A5.6 FLU1=1.4E+07 FLU10=2.3E+04 PKI=5655 5544 PAI=042
- BOU-DEV=084,110,075,053,050,096,058,021 DEV-AVG=068 NT SWF=00:000
- XRAY-MAX= B4.0 @ 1133UT XRAY-MIN= A4.2 @ 1833UT XRAY-AVG= A8.3
- NEUTN-MAX= +003% @ 0120UT NEUTN-MIN= -003% @ 1835UT NEUTN-AVG= +0.0%
- PCA-MAX= +0.2DB @ 0135UT PCA-MIN= -0.3DB @ 0935UT PCA-AVG= +0.0DB
- BOUTF-MAX=55361NT @ 0128UT BOUTF-MIN=55284NT @ 1727UT BOUTF-AVG=55323NT
- GOES7-MAX=P:+000NT@ 0000UT GOES7-MIN=N:+000NT@ 0000UT G7-AVG=+065,+000,+000
- GOES6-MAX=P:+127NT@ 1539UT GOES6-MIN=N:-133NT@ 0339UT G6-AVG=+087,+025,-053
- FLUXFCST=STD:090,095,095;SESC:090,095,095 BAI/PAI-FCST=018,015,010/025,015,010
- KFCST=2214 5222 3224 3111 27DAY-AP=015,008 27DAY-KP=3433 3332 2233 2222
- WARNINGS=*GSTRM
- ALERTS=**MINSTRM
- !!END-DATA!!
-
- NOTE: The Effective Sunspot Number for 14 MAR 94 was 30.8.
- The Full Kp Indices for 14 MAR 94 are: 4- 5- 5- 4o 4+ 4o 4- 4o
- The 3-Hr Ap Indices for 14 MAR 94 are: 24 37 39 26 34 28 21 30
- Greater than 2 MeV Electron Fluence for 15 MAR is: 1.3E+09
-
-
- SYNOPSIS OF ACTIVITY
- --------------------
-
- Solar activity was very low. Regions 7691 (N07W05) and
- 7692 (N15E72) were numbered.
-
- Solar activity forecast: solar activity is expected to be
- very low to low. Region 7688 (N18E08) has the best chance of
- producing an occassional C-class flare.
-
- The geomagnetic field has been at active to minor storm
- levels for the past 24 hours. High latitude stations reported
- unsettled to severe storm levels throughout the period.
- Energetic electron fluxes (GT 2 MeV) ranged from moderate to
- very high levels during the period.
-
- Geophysical activity forecast: the geomagnetic field is
- expected to be unsettled to active for the next 24 hours then
- mostly unsettled for the remainder of the period.
-
- Event probabilities 16 mar-18 mar
-
- Class M 01/01/01
- Class X 01/01/01
- Proton 01/01/01
- PCAF Green
-
- Geomagnetic activity probabilities 16 mar-18 mar
-
- A. Middle Latitudes
- Active 30/25/15
- Minor Storm 20/15/10
- Major-Severe Storm 05/05/01
-
- B. High Latitudes
- Active 35/30/35
- Minor Storm 20/20/15
- Major-Severe Storm 10/10/05
-
- HF propagation conditions remained degraded over the last
- 24 hours. Renewed geomagnetic storming has kept conditions
- below-normal over the high and polar latitudes to many middle
- latitude paths (particularly night-sector paths). Similar
- degraded conditions will likely persist through most of 16
- March before improving on 17 and 18 March.
-
-
- COPIES OF JOINT USAF/NOAA SESC SOLAR GEOPHYSICAL REPORTS
- ========================================================
-
- REGIONS WITH SUNSPOTS. LOCATIONS VALID AT 15/2400Z MARCH
- --------------------------------------------------------
- NMBR LOCATION LO AREA Z LL NN MAG TYPE
- 7688 N19E08 224 0100 CAO 07 009 BETA
- 7691 N07W05 237 0000 AXX 01 001 ALPHA
- 7692 N17E72 160 0040 HSX 01 001 ALPHA
- REGIONS DUE TO RETURN 16 MARCH TO 18 MARCH
- NMBR LAT LO
- NONE
-
-
- LISTING OF SOLAR ENERGETIC EVENTS FOR 15 MARCH, 1994
- ----------------------------------------------------
- BEGIN MAX END RGN LOC XRAY OP 245MHZ 10CM SWEEP
- NONE
-
-
- POSSIBLE CORONAL MASS EJECTION EVENTS FOR 15 MARCH, 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------
- BEGIN MAX END LOCATION TYPE SIZE DUR II IV
- 15/ 1132 1151 S15W90 EPL B4.0 11
- 15/B1742 B1847 S06W23 DSF
-
-
- INFERRED CORONAL HOLES. LOCATIONS VALID AT 15/2400Z
- ---------------------------------------------------
- ISOLATED HOLES AND POLAR EXTENSIONS
- EAST SOUTH WEST NORTH CAR TYPE POL AREA OBSN
- 70 N35E87 S19E46 S06E26 N38E87 192 ISO POS 018 10830A
-
-
- SUMMARY OF FLARE EVENTS FOR THE PREVIOUS UTC DAY
- ------------------------------------------------
-
- Date Begin Max End Xray Op Region Locn 2695 MHz 8800 MHz 15.4 GHz
- ------ ---- ---- ---- ---- -- ------ ------ --------- --------- ---------
- 14 Mar: 0200 0207 0220 B1.4
-
-
- REGION FLARE STATISTICS FOR THE PREVIOUS UTC DAY
- ------------------------------------------------
-
- C M X S 1 2 3 4 Total (%)
- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --- ------
- Uncorrellated: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 001 (100.0)
-
- Total Events: 001 optical and x-ray.
-
-
- EVENTS WITH SWEEPS AND/OR OPTICAL PHENOMENA FOR THE LAST UTC DAY
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date Begin Max End Xray Op Region Locn Sweeps/Optical Observations
- ------ ---- ---- ---- ---- -- ------ ------ ---------------------------
- NO EVENTS OBSERVED.
-
- NOTES:
- All times are in Universal Time (UT). Characters preceding begin, max,
- and end times are defined as: B = Before, U = Uncertain, A = After.
- All times associated with x-ray flares (ex. flares which produce
- associated x-ray bursts) refer to the begin, max, and end times of the
- x-rays. Flares which are not associated with x-ray signatures use the
- optical observations to determine the begin, max, and end times.
-
- Acronyms used to identify sweeps and optical phenomena include:
-
- II = Type II Sweep Frequency Event
- III = Type III Sweep
- IV = Type IV Sweep
- V = Type V Sweep
- Continuum = Continuum Radio Event
- Loop = Loop Prominence System,
- Spray = Limb Spray,
- Surge = Bright Limb Surge,
- EPL = Eruptive Prominence on the Limb.
-
-
- ** End of Daily Report **
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 1994 17:00:33 GMT
- From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!dog.ee.lbl.gov!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!emory!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary@network.ucsd.edu
- Subject: Diesel or Taurus fr HF/VHF mobile??
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- In article <CMrDCs.3Bn@hpqmoea.sqf.hp.com> dstock@hpqmoca.sqf.hp.com (David Stockton) writes:
- > Another guess.... spoke to dad last night, he said he'd seen
- >sparks from toothed-belt cam drives sometimes.
- >
- > Could you possibly have an inintentional Van de Graaf zapping away ?
- >or was it chain/gear drive ?
-
- Chain and gear.
-
- > A long shot, but then so is magnetohydrodynamics in the combustion
- >chamber... although I'd still machine up a set of dummy heater plugs..
-
- I might be tempted if I hadn't unloaded the turkey. Note though that
- the glow plugs were grounded directly to the block when we disconnected
- the power wiring. If we were getting hash out of those short loops, the
- currents must have been huge.
-
- Gary
-
- --
- Gary Coffman KE4ZV | You make it, | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
- Destructive Testing Systems | we break it. | uunet!rsiatl!ke4zv!gary
- 534 Shannon Way | Guaranteed! | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
- Lawrenceville, GA 30244 | |
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 1994 12:55:42 -0500
- From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news.cac.psu.edu!psuvm!rohvm1!rohvm1.mah48d@network.ucsd.edu
- Subject: Info Req. Vintage Gear
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- In article <1994Mar15.053911.21931@dal1>, giddy@ac.dal.ca wrote:
- >
- > I'm new here. Are there people around this group who might be knowledgable
- > about older communications receivers?
- >
- > I am interested in starting to collect some of the gear I and many of my
- > contemporaries started out with. (Hammarlund, Hallicrafters, National etc.)
- >
- > I am concerned about availabiliy of service info and not paying too much
- > (I would not pay HRO-60 prices for a Knight Ocean-Hopper :-) )
-
- Check out the hamfests. I'm always seeing older gear that makes me wish I
- _were_ a collector--but collectors need space to put the stuff. Prices are
- _very_ reasonable during the transition period between when gear is just
- old and obsolete, and when it becomes classic. :-) At a lot of hamfests
- sellers don't know that their gear has suddenly gone classic, so they price
- it in the "boatanchor" range. Besides, hamfests are fun!
-
- --
- John Taylor (W3ZID) | "The opinions expressed are those of the
- rohvm1.mah48d@rohmhaas.com | writer and not of Rohm and Haas Company."
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 15 Mar 1994 22:40:33 MST
- From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!dog.ee.lbl.gov!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!alberta!ve6mgs!usenet@network.ucsd.edu
- Subject: WARNING: Potential Satellite Anomaly Warning Update - 16 March
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
-
- POTENTIAL SATELLITE ANOMALY WARNING
-
- UPDATED: 05:00 UT, 16 MARCH
-
- /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
-
-
- ATTENTION:
-
- Energetic electrons at greater than 2 MeV continue to exist at levels
- capable of producing charging effects on geosynchronous satellites. Total
- electron fluence for this event thus far is 1.28E+10 el/cm^2-ster-day. Peak
- electron fluence occurred on 12 March at 2.4E+09 el/cm^2-ster-day. Since
- then, fluence levels have been hovering around 2.0E+09. Moderate to
- occasionally very high populations of energetic electrons at greater than 2
- MeV can be expected over the next 24 hours.
-
- Electrons are expected to begin falling back toward background levels
- over the next 3 to 5 days.
-
-
- ** End of Warning **
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 1994 16:24:32 GMT
- From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!galaxy.ucr.edu!library.ucla.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!emory!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary@network.ucsd.edu
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- References <CMpoo5.3MK@cbnewsm.cb.att.com>, <POPOVICH.94Mar15103708@prince.cs.columbia.edu>, <189@ted.win.net>
- Reply-To : gary@ke4zv.atl.ga.us (Gary Coffman)
- Subject : Re: noise blankers
-
- In article <189@ted.win.net> mjsilva@ted.win.net (Michael Silva) writes:
- >
- >In article <POPOVICH.94Mar15103708@prince.cs.columbia.edu>, Steve Popovich (popovich@prince.cs.columbia.edu) writes:
- >>
- >>Well, the noise blanker on the old Kenwood TS-830S is definitely a
- >>"decorative knob". No matter how much I twiddle the one our club has,
- >>it doesn't do a thing about the static crashes on 40 and 80 meters at
- >>night. Isn't that the kind of noise they're supposed to be FOR?
- >> -Steve
- >>
- >
- >I don't know how good or bad the 830's noise blanker is, but a general
- >answer to your question "isn't that the kind of noise..." is that
- >blankers work best on the noise that's the most dissimilar to a
- >signal. High amplitude, short duration noise, aka impulse noise, is
- >the easiest for circuitry to distinguish and eliminate. On the other
- >hand, any noise that's in the audio band and is roughly the same
- >amplitude as the desired signal is impossible for normal circuitry to
- >remove. I know DSP can help here, but I don't know enough about it to
- >say how effective it is.
-
- Mike's right. A noise blanker works by detecting impulse edges, good
- ones operate outside the normal IF channel because the filters tend
- to round off the edges and lengthen the pulses. Static crashes on
- HF are ionosphere propagated lightning stroke RF. If you remember
- pulse theory, the rapid risetime of a pulse is made up of odd order
- harmonics of the fundamental frequency, in lightning that's somewhere
- between DC and light. :-) So the sharpest part of the edge is VHF or
- above. The ionosphere doesn't propagate VHF the same as it does HF,
- so what you hear at your receiver is a "rounded" and stretched version
- of the original pulse. The blanker can't do anything with that. If it
- tried, it would also cut speech components, or the rising edges of CW
- elements.
-
- If you've ever been near a lightning strike, you've heard the characteristic
- click-BOOM of the strike. The "click" part is the sharpest part of the edge.
- A noise blanker could remove *that*, but what are you doing operating that
- close to a thunderstorm? :-) Local impulse noise, like ignition noise and
- dimmer noise, will have a sharp risetime that the blanker can get a hold of,
- and will be suppressed. That's what a blanker does for you.
-
- Another method, called a *noise limiter* can be of help with static
- crashes and other strong noises. What it does is *clip* the waveform
- above a certain threshold. It doesn't remove the noise, but it limits
- its magnitude to a more tolerable level. Unfortunately, it will also
- clip the peaks of a desired signal unless receiver RF gain is set just
- right, and that will cause signal distortion. Noise limiters are no
- longer common on today's radios with few knobs and AGC.
-
- Gary
- --
- Gary Coffman KE4ZV | You make it, | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
- Destructive Testing Systems | we break it. | uunet!rsiatl!ke4zv!gary
- 534 Shannon Way | Guaranteed! | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
- Lawrenceville, GA 30244 | |
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 1994 15:56:33 GMT
- From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!library.ucla.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!emory!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary@network.ucsd.edu
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- References <CMo7GF.4sy@srgenprp.sr.hp.com>, <1994Mar15.145856.8336@ke4zv.atl.ga.us>, <2m4rsv$mba@bigfoot.wustl.edu>
- Reply-To : gary@ke4zv.atl.ga.us (Gary Coffman)
- Subject : Re: Grounding and lightning protection
-
- In article <2m4rsv$mba@bigfoot.wustl.edu> jlw3@cec3.wustl.edu (Jesse L Wei) writes:
- >Gary Coffman (gary@ke4zv.atl.ga.us) wrote:
- >
- >: Mobile Radio Technology had a series in the April and October 1988,
- >: and January 1989 issues about lightning prevention systems. They
- >: tried to give both sides equal time, but it's clear that the dissipation
- >: arrays are at best only minimally preventative, if at all.
- >
- >Now I have no technical expertise here, but I'd like to ask a couple
- >of questions: 1) Does the Corona effect prevent strikes, 2) do spline
- >balls work, 3) what about "feeler" charges? The reason I ask is that
- >Richardson Wireless Klub (K5RWK) had a meeting last night in which
- >a Richardson ham (I think) who works for TU Electric came and gave a
- >~1.5 hour lecture on lightning, prevention, and RF grounding. He
- >brought up some of the above-mentioned issues, and also said at the
- >end that he submitted an article to "one of the ham magazines."
- >Your thoughts???
-
- First I want to note that I'm coming from the perspective of someone
- involved in protecting broadcast transmission systems, and as someone
- with lightning simulator experience. Also the local area has a thunderstorm
- frequency second only to Florida in the US. So I've seen a lot of strikes,
- and have a feel for what works and what doesn't. What I can't supply is
- much in the way of formal theory on the subject, only my reading of the
- trade press and a fair bit of other literature on the subject.
-
- With that disclaimer out of the way, I'll give you my thoughts on your
- questions.
-
- 1) Corona, or point dischargers, are limited to about 20-60 microamps
- before streamer production begins. Streamers are the main mechanism
- by which near Earth lightning strikes are guided. So if corona breaks
- over into streamer production, you're going to attract lightning.
-
- That's the principle on which lightning rods are founded. They generate
- streamers so that they are the preferred target of lightning bolts. Since
- they are installed with low impedance paths to ground, they are able to
- *divert* strike currents from harming other nearby structures. This is
- called the "cone of protection". It's diameter is equal to about 1/3
- the HAAT of the lightning rod in most installations. (High towers have
- other problems, and a "rolling sphere" method of estimating the protective
- zone must be used.)
-
- 2) The idea behind "spline balls", and other dissipation systems, is
- to multiply the number of point dischargers so that currents can be
- shared so as to keep any one point's current below the streamer
- threshold. It's a good idea in theory, but in practice if the points
- are close together, their corona merges and forms streamers.
-
- Remember that a typical strike is powered by about 20 coulombs of
- charge, and that individual points can't exceed about 60 ua without
- breaking into streamer production. So even if you have widely
- separated points to prevent merger, you still need an incredibly
- large number of them, especially if the cloud is capable of multiple
- strikes, which is the usual case. Also remember that cloud charge
- zones are in constant motion, and constantly inducing "mirror"
- charges in the ground below, so you don't have much *time* to discharge
- the currents safely.
-
- The idea of a "protective space charge" is pure hokum IMHO. The winds
- in a storm are going to blow away any ions formed by corona as quickly
- as they can be produced.
-
- 3) I'm not familiar with the term "feeler charge" so I'll have to defer
- a response on that subject.
-
-
- I'll add one more thought. There's a theory that if you can cause a
- *lot* of *little* lightning bolts, you can avoid the big dangerous
- ones. These "mini" bolts are supposedly so small that you can't see
- their strikes with the naked eye, but can measure them on a surge
- counter. This idea *may* work if the storm clouds aren't very energetic,
- and take *minutes* to build up to a strike, but I don't think it works
- in practice with the big thunderboomers we typically see.
-
- Gary
- --
- Gary Coffman KE4ZV | You make it, | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
- Destructive Testing Systems | we break it. | uunet!rsiatl!ke4zv!gary
- 534 Shannon Way | Guaranteed! | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
- Lawrenceville, GA 30244 | |
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 1994 17:39:59 +0000
- From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!dog.ee.lbl.gov!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk!pavo.csi.cam.ac.uk!pipex!demon!g8sjp.demon.co.uk!ip@network.ucsd.edu
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- References <2lqka5$8k3@news.iastate.edu>, <2m09j7$4i@apple.com>, <2m78pf$5kh@news.iastate.edu>8
- Reply-To : ip@g8sjp.demon.co.uk
- Subject : Re: 1x1 Callsigns?
-
- In article <2m78pf$5kh@news.iastate.edu>
- wjturner@iastate.edu "William J Turner" writes:
-
- > In article <2m09j7$4i@apple.com> kchen@apple.com (Kok Chen) writes:
-
- [snip]
-
- > >Geez, perhaps I can move to the UAE and use A6TY :-).
- >
- > That call wouldn't be leagal there, as A6 is the *prefix*, and the prefix does
- > *not* include the mandatory number. Thus for my call, N0RDV, the prefix is N,
- > not N0. Therefore, calls in UAE could be A6#XX, but not A6XX.
- >
- > Understand?
-
- Ummm .... I think there is a lack of understanding about just who it is that
- is failing to understand :-)
-
- Calls is UAE *COULD* be anything that the competent authority decides to issue
- that *begin with* A6. Who said that there HAS to be a number following the
- prefix? 'Mandatory number' is something that you appear to have invented.
-
- Yes, your callsign prefix is 'N', and the reason it's followed by a '0' is
- simple beacuse the FCC decided it should be that way. According to callsign
- allocations for the USA, if the FCC had decided to issue you with the call
- 'NOTWITHSTANDING', then that would have been perfectly legal and acceptable,
- although perhaps not to you :-)
-
- Understand?
-
- --
- Iain Philipps
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of Info-Hams Digest V94 #297
- ******************************
- ******************************
-